Hyperswitch vs Lago
Both in Payments & billing — compared item by item
Hyperswitch
Open source, composable payments platform | PCI compliant | SaaS and Self-host options | Enables connectivity to multiple payment, payout, fraud, vault and tokenization providers | Uplifts authorization with intelligent routing and revenue recovery | Reduce payment processing costs with cost observability | Reduces payment ops with reconciliation
Lago
Open Source Metering and Usage Based Billing API ⭐️ Consumption tracking, Subscription management, Pricing iterations, Payment orchestration & Revenue analytics
| Hyperswitch | Lago | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | ★ 43.7k | ★ 10.6k |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last updated | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-18 |
| Usage | 🐳 Self-hosted | 🐳 Self-hosted |
| Platforms | — | — |
| Category | Payments & billing | Payments & billing |
How to choose
- They support exactly the same usage modes; the difference is in ecosystem and implementation details.
- Hyperswitch has a clearly larger community (43.7k vs 10.6k), so answers, plugins and tutorials are easier to find.
- Hyperswitch was updated more recently (2026-09-22).
- Different licenses (Apache-2.0 vs AGPL-3.0) — check the terms before commercial use.